ikfoundation.org
Promoting Natural & Cultural History
Blue or green woollen coats were two of many variations of justaucorps or knee-length coats suitable for various everyday and festive occasions. A practical and warm garment worn by “ordinary” men, which were inspired by military clothing as well as more lavish designs made from luxurious fabrics preferred by a small group of wealthy aristocrats et al. This essay is based on a selection of 18th century primary sources – including dove-tail tapestries woven in farming communities, broadcloth samples, preserved garments, artwork as well as travel journals and some further local observations made by the naturalists Carl Linnaeus and Pehr Osbeck in Sweden. Other aspects briefly looked into will be the weaving, dyeing and teasing of such woollen qualities together with a multitude of other skilled processes before the broadcloth could be used for garments.
This style of upper garment – in a somewhat altered model – was in common use by the country people in many provinces of Sweden later in the century, as illustrated on the images above and below. Practical use of clothes, traditions, sumptuary laws, fashion preferences, accessibility to suitable cloth, skilled dyers and a multitude of other local factors often make it hard to give exact evidence for how, when and where inspirations took place for a particular garment. Gradual shifts linked the wealthy strata of society to military uniforms to townsmen, tailors and further on to the dominating group in society – the farmers. Everyday meetings and random encounters between these groups of people over decades or even over a century a more, influenced clothing and made some traditions to stay popular for shorter or longer periods in different geographical areas. However, research by the late historian Anna-Maja Nylén shows that the widespread use of justaucorps in the farming community at this time had an unusually well-documented history. She noticed the direct contact in a widespread area via Karl XI’s (1655-1697) and Karl XII’s (1682-1718) soldiers: ‘Through Karl XI’s army reform the country was divided into small sections, which each and everyone should be responsible for its soldier’s upkeep and clothing according to regulations of the uniform. At the time when the division was taken place during the 1680s and the uniform was decided, it became inspired by the French fashion with tight-fitting breeches and knee-length justaucorps with tail-slits and large pockets with pocket flaps, sleeve lapels and buttons.'
During his many years in the parish of Hasslöv, Pehr Osbeck could hardly avoid seeing the changes in the parishioners’ way of dressing. It was principally their festive garb that interested him, whilst the everyday clothes presented fewer variations. It was not only the styles that changed, but the colours and materials differed too. For the men the novelty was that in 1758 they had mainly worn grey homespun whereas 40 years on they dressed in blue adorned with silver buttons, wore hats with velvet ribbons, silk braid and fur coats as he mentioned in his description of the area in 1796.
Although manufacture made fabrics generally increased during the 18th century, Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778) – among other contemporary making notes about such traditions – nonetheless showed an interest in the manufactured textiles out of all proportion in comparison with home-crafted articles; particularly bearing in mind that the production of the manufactures only formed a modest percentage as compared to the febrile activity going on in the homes in the form of weaving, embroidering, knitting, employing a number of textile techniques. Weaving for the household’s own needs prevailed all over the country, mainly textiles necessary for the beds and clothes – like woollen cloth which after a fulling process either became broadcloth or the coarser wadmal, both equally suitable for warm and practical coats.
Additionally, dyeing blue was more complex than for instance yellow, brown or red, not only because the process with vat-dyeing was so much more intricate, but also because there was in fact only one plant in Sweden which yielded blue dye, woad (Isatis tinctoria). That dye plant and the imported indigo (Indigofera tinctoria), in the main via colonial and East India trade networks, were the two dyestuffs which were used in parallel in 18th century Sweden. However, still with the balance on the side of the domestic woad; but woad was also imported to cover the country’s demand as described by Carl Linnaeus in his journal from the Västergötland Journey in 1746. Natural dyeing of a “true green” colour however, is not possible to produce whilst using only one single plant; dyeing has to be done twice, first yellow and then using a blue dyestuff, resulting in a green colour. Contemporary books on dyeing describe the procedure thoroughly: first dyeing yellow with leaves of silver birch, dyer’s weed or dyer’s broom, followed by a blue dye-vat of indigo or woad. That method yields the most durable green colour that can be extracted from plant dyes.
Sources: