ikfoundation.org
Promoting Natural & Cultural History
The double interlocked tapestries, or “rölakan” – along with many other textiles – only begin to achieve their beauty, strength, and usability when the details of preparation, weaving, and post-production all come together. During the preparation of weaving "rölakan” in the 18th and 19th centuries, each element was crafted by hand with the aid of various simple tools. Thus, it was of utmost importance to be meticulous in choosing materials, natural dyes, pattern composition, markings with names or letters, the cushion’s filling, as well as any decorative borders, ribbons, or corner tassels.
It is important to emphasise that the patterns and natural dyes chosen by the Swedish woman weavers were not random or down to her personal preference but stemmed from historical traditions, local characteristics and the economic conditions of said time. However, this did not prevent the development of personal colour/pattern choices in conjunction with the choice of decorative ribbons, tassels, borders or markings, which gave a unique touch to each weave. Even with studying nearly 2,000 double-interlocked tapestries alone for this project, no two were identical.
Nearly all (c. 95%) of the documented double interlocked tapestries or “rölakan” have flax for the warp and wool for the weft. The other examples have hemp as a warp thread, yet it is sometimes uncertain if flax or hemp had been used, whilst in some individual cases, jute or cotton may have been used. With the weft, the wool was on some rare occasions, added with metal thread, used to strengthen the vividness of the woollen yarns. Whilst in poorer regions; a stronger cow hair yarn could be mixed with the wool to increase the amount of raw material.
All colours of the spectrum were produced from natural dyes. Primarily from plants but also in some aspects from various lice, first and foremost the cochineal from the second half of this period.
Generally, these textiles were woven in clear, sharp and saturated colours, often with great contrasts. Yellow and brown tones were the easiest to produce when using readily available Nordic flora. Whilst green, red and blue carried certain limitations, these colours were preferred in regions of economic prosperity, where it was possible to spend a lot of time on weaving and dyeing or buying imported dyes.
Sources: