ikfoundation.org
Promoting Natural & Cultural History
The double interlocked tapestries or “rölakan” – together with many other textiles – only begins to reach its beauty, strength and usability, when the details of preparation, weaving and post production all come together. When preparing the weaving of “rölakan” during the 18th and 19th centuries; each element was done by hand with the help of various simple tools. Hence it was of the utmost importance to be careful in choosing; materials, natural dyes, pattern composition, markings with names or letters, the cushion’s filling, as well as possible decorative borders, ribbons or corner tassels.
It is important to emphasise that the patterns and natural dyes chosen by the Swedish woman weavers were not random or down to her personal preference but stemming from historical traditions, local characteristics and the economic conditions of said time. However this did not prevent the development of personal colour/pattern choices in conjunction with the choice of decorative ribbons, tassels, borders or markings which gave a unique touch to each weave. Even with studying nearly 2,000 double interlocked tapestries alone for this project, no two were identical.
Nearly all (c. 95%) of the documented double interlocked tapestries or “rölakan” have flax for the warp and wool for the weft. The other examples have hemp as a warp thread, yet it is sometimes uncertain if flax or hemp had been used, whilst in some individual cases jute or cotton may have been used. With the weft, the wool were on some rare occasions added with metal thread, used to strengthen the vividness of the woollen yarns. Whilst in poorer regions; a stronger cow-hair yarn could be mixed with the wool to increase the amount of raw material.
All colours of the spectrum were produced from natural dyes. Primarily from plants but also in some aspects from various lice, first and foremost the cochineal from the second half of this period.
Generally these textiles were woven in clear, sharp and saturated colours, often with great contrasts. Yellow and brown tones were the easiest to produce when using readily available Nordic flora. Whilst green, red and blue carried with them certain limitations, these colours were therefore preferred in regions of economic prosperity, where it was possible to spend a lot of time on weaving and dyeing or buying imported dyes.
Sources: