ikfoundation.org
Promoting Natural & Cultural History
Documents in the Piper Family archive include evidence of frequent needlework, purchases of embroidered furnishing textiles and to some extent other handicraft during the period 1730s to 1790s. This essay is based on research on inventory lists, auction protocols, correspondence and accounts which, when looked at more closely side by side give rediscovered information about daily life in an aristocratic family. The sources reveal that the manor houses included textile objects created by the lady of the house, daughters et al. Together with ownership of professionally made imported embroideries via long-distance trade as well as linen and featherbeds marked with initials, probably made by the housekeeper or other female servants. A selection of contemporary artworks, a reel and a lacquered Chinese sewing box, add some further knowledge of handicraft and illustrate in what type of settings or furnished rooms such occupations took place.
One proof of embroidery in the family can be linked to the Countess Ulrika Christina Mörner of Morlanda (1709-1778), traced via a contemporary letter from her oldest son, Carl Gustaf (1737-1803), addressed to his father Count Carl Fredrik Piper (1700-1770). It may be noted that this wealthy couple used Ängsö manor house as one of their homes during the 1760s, that is to say concurrent with the time of the illustration above. Their son resided in Stockholm at this time, as he since 1757 worked as chamberlain for king Adolf Fredrik (1710-1771). He wrote on May 1763: ‘My hope is that dear mother was satisfied with the yarn, at least Jana says that there is no better to be found, and that it after washing will be rose-red, even if it now looks dark. She names it Turkish yarn’. Whilst in an undated partly preserved 18th century Inventory from one of the family’s estates, reveals that lace making was part of the handicraft in the Piper family circle. This object was listed as ‘Lace cushion covered with red leather’. That is to say a bobbin lace cushion.
Portable work-boxes may also have been the natural choice for many women of the nobility, as boxes of this type easily could be transported together with personal belongings – not included in inventory lists – when they travelled from their main home to a summer residence, to friends or elsewhere. It is also notable that this lack of sewing tables and other tools, differ from several other contemporary or later (1749-1792) inventory lists, auction protocols and other handwritten records researched from the same archive. These documents, which are discussed and quoted below in a translation, include a number of either embroidered interior furnishing, sewing-tables or tools that were useful for handicraft.
The family’s high standard of living is primarily visible from a handicraft perspective via luxury objects purchased via the East India trade or imported yarn from the local merchant. Equally as more ordinary craft skills were necessary within the domestic sphere to secure one’s comfortable everyday life – like carding and spinning of wool used for woven woollen featherbeds, marking of linen as well as decorative embroideries for furnishing textiles. These types of objects could either be made by the lady of the house herself, daughters who learned various educational crafts, other female relatives and not least assisting servants or for more complex household textiles of a local or national nature; temporary hired weavers who put up their looms on the manor house or to order objects from professional embroiderers in nearby towns or cities.
The earlier mentioned Count Carl Fredrik Piper owned ‘six shares or lots in the East India Company’ in the 1750s-60s, to a value of 6,000 Rixdollar silver coins, which with every successful voyage could bring in a dividend of between 30 and 50%. This was a period, which was contemporary with several of the inventories, which listed East India goods. Already a few decades earlier though, notes of such desired interior furnishing, can be traced in a letter sent from Stockholm by the general major and Count Gustaf Abraham Piper (1692-1761) to the same Carl Fredrik Piper on 20 August 1736. This particular letter reveals details about the international life and travels of the Swedish aristocracy and how objects of Chinese origin could be taken to Sweden via other geographical routes than the ordinary East India sea trade route. The writer informed about that Count Nils Bonde (1685-1760) had just arrived home from Russia and among many objects he brought back:
Whilst another possibility to purchase imported goods was via well renowned local shops, located at a reasonable distance from one of the family’s manor houses. For instance, in a half-year-long account dated May 1772 – the aristocracy had long credits – from the merchants Falkman and Suell in Malmö (southernmost Sweden) the following textile related goods were noted: silk fabric, gold thread, silver thread and angora goat hair (named ‘kamel garn’ [camel yarn]) included in a long list of other desired wares for the household.
An interesting example of fine silks and velvets with embroidered decorations in the ownership of the aristocratic Piper family, has instead been possible to trace via a document listing the share of furniture for Mr Nils Adam Bielke (1724-1792) at Sturefors manor house in 1749:
‘A piece of furniture from the middle floor by the Cabinet; of green velvet and 15 ribbons, embroidered with yellow and silver threads, on white silk Atlas, with narrow golden galloons [ ]wood over, under and around below, of 5 large and small pieces, lined with fabric. A linen cover for this object.’ Despite his surname Bielke, he was the son of the late Charlotta Christina Piper (1694-1727), who had been Carl Fredrik Piper’s oldest sister.
This essay will conclude with two records, which present rediscovered knowledge of possessions linked to textile handicraft and to some extent purchased luxury embroideries during the 18th century – for the Swedish aristocracy in general and the Piper family in particular. Firstly, an Inventory from Krageholm manor house in 1754, which gives such insights from several angles:
Bedclothes
1 yellow striped long featherbed, marked with CFP [Carl Fredrik Piper]
[This is one example of many similar featherbeds with various markings]
Coaches and sledges
1 brown French saddle without steelyard, with its stirrups and straps, additionally a cover of green broadcloth with silver embroidery.
Bedcovers
1 red and green embroidered bedcover of silk fabric with linen lining.
Tables
1 small sewing table | 1 ditto | 1 ditto
Wood products
3 Sewing frames | 2 ditto | 2 Spools [for winding yarn] | 3 ditto
Various goods
1 pair of carding brushes for cotton | 1 pair of ditto | 1 pair of carding brushes for wool | 1 pair of ditto | 1 pair of ditto | 1 sewing pad
The second list, dates almost 40 years later and has been researched via an auction protocol in 1792 for baron Otto Wilhelm Mörner’s (1733-1791) manor house Toppeladugård, situated in the southernmost province Skåne. Who just as his wife Ulrika Fredrika Piper (1732-1791) had died in the previous year, without having any heirs as their 17/18 year old daughter sadly had died in 1790. Tools and embroidered objects are part of the very extensive and detailed document, counting 322 pages. A loom is lacking in the protocol, but a number of reels, yarn winders and other tools may indicate that – besides handicraft made by the lady of the house, their daughter or other possible female relatives – servants had spun the yarn too, to be used for weaving of linen in the household.
Wooden goods
3 Sewing frames | 2 Ditto | 1 Spinning wheel | 1 Reel
Linen sheets
1 pair of linen sheets and 4 pair of pillow cases, marked in red thread
Various objects
1 pair of carding brushes for cotton | 1 pair ditto | 1 pair of carding brushes | 1 pair ditto | 1 pair ditto | 1 Embroidered fire screen with red and white linen cover | 2 Embroidery cushions with a screw [to fasten on table]
Added objects
1 Reel
Appendix for the auction protocol
1 Spinning wheel | 1 Yarn winder | 1 ditto | 1 ditto | 1 ditto | 1 Reel | 1 Yarn winder | 1 ditto | 1 Reel | 1 Spinning wheel | 1 small sewing frame | 1 Reel | 1 Sewing frame | 1 ditto | 1 small sewing frame | 1 lod [≈13,29 grams] Turkish yarn | 2 lod [≈26,54 grams] White cotton yarn | 11 lod [≈146 grams] reeled linen tow yarn | 3 lod [≈40 grams] Cotton | 1 lod [≈13,29 grams] ditto | 1 Sewing box on a foot
………………………….
Notice: All quotes have been transcribed from original handwritten documents in Swedish and translated into English by Viveka Hansen. This essay is the first of two case studies about embroideries and other handicraft researched from these archival sources. The second essay will be a continuation and to reflect on the Piper family’s circumstances in this context during the period 1800 to the 1850s.
Sources: