ikfoundation.org
Promoting Natural & Cultural History
For a multitude of reasons, candles and lamps were repeatedly mentioned in the journals of Carl Linnaeus’ seventeen Apostles – who made natural history journeys to more than 50 countries. Primarily due to their reading or writing during dark hours, movement in the darkness, observations of ceremonial traditions, how candles were produced etc. Whilst lanterns, torches and fires were other sources of light in these descriptions dating from the 1740s to 1790s. This essay will focus on such attention to details when being associated with a good night’s sleep in comfortable beds, Tahitian bark cloths, the preference of cotton wicks and other textile perspectives. Observations, which give enlightening information of everyday life in Paris, London, Philadelphia, Canton (Guangzhou), Nagasaki and other geographical areas visited by seven of these travelling naturalists.
Pehr Kalm’s travel journal reveals further information on the subject of the Norwegian coastal communities, due to his general interest and curiosity as well as professional aims on his way towards the North American colonies – via England – to report about learned natural knowledge from all possible angles. For instance on 17 December 1747, he noted from Arendal:
A few months later when arriving to Philadelphia by ship from London, Pehr Kalm’s first destination in North America, more practical matters were related to for himself and his assistant’s daily life. Kalm reported, for instance the following in his journal on 16 September 1748:
It was not only Pehr Osbeck’s detailed personal experiences of the troublesome mosquitoes and the necessity to use curtains or nets in the hot climate, which were thoroughly listed in his descriptions of Canton. During his first months (autumn 1751) in the trading city, lamps were just as important for the smooth running of everyday life. He noted for instance that in each room was a lamp, fastened to the roof by a long rope, but they also ‘have both white wax candles and others, which they call Lapp-tiock.’ A fine gauzy fabric was additionally used for lanterns: ’Behind this the yard is quite open in front, but on the sides are rooms both above and below. In the side roofs are here and there some lanterns of painted gauze, in some of which they burn lamps at night.’ Such gauzy painted fabrics were probably either made of cotton or silk.
During the same decade in another part of the world, the Carl Linnaeus’ (1707-1778) apostle Daniel Rolander (1723 or 1725-1793) visited Suriname. His extensive journal, originally written in Latin, reveals some informative details on sources of light, textiles and insects alike. The arrival and the early days in the country were particularly difficult for Rolander: a combination of heat, humidity, strong smells, insects’ buzzing, “dangerous animals” and a general feeling of uneasiness. Sleeping and getting some night rest was also extremely trying, at the same time as he had to get used to sleeping in a hammock. Yet that berth was thought considerably more comfortable in the constant heat than a warm bed. The hammock could also have the advantage of making it more difficult for crawling insects to surprise the sleeper, though it was no guarantee as they might drop down from the ceiling, which is mentioned on 26 June 1755. ‘About midnight, a short time before I had gone to sleep, I felt a small animal moving on my foot. I immediately grabbed a lit candle, and having carefully and gradually withdrawn the hammock from my foot, I discovered a Scorpio Americanus slowly moving across my foot. My hair stood on end and my limbs turned to ice, but nevertheless I kept my foot still until this unpleasant insect had gone past it and into the hammock.’ Rolander escaped unscathed from the incident and continued to sleep in the hammock. He also noted the significance of that sleeping arrangement in other contexts, mainly to do with what materials were used and who manufactured them. On a visit to an indigenous people, the following brief and illuminating sentence was entered on 4 August 1755: ‘At night he slept wrapped in the same hammock, which was woven, as usual, out of cotton and coloured red.’ Some weeks later – 26 September in 1755 – Rolander also combined candle light with his handkerchief to catch crickets and study their acclimatisation to light as part of his observations of insects.
Additionally, Thunberg noticed the following traditions linked to light and textiles on his journey to the Japanese Court in 1776:
His observations were truly reflecting global cultures, often with admiration or curiosity in visited areas – stretching over a nine year period from 1770 to 1779 – starting from Uppsala in Sweden passing through or staying for longer periods in Denmark, Holland, France, the Cape area (South Africa), Java, Japan, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), England and the German speaking lands (Germany). Already during his circa half-year stay in Paris, notes about fine textiles and the significance of candlelight in ceremonies were included in his extensive journal. For instance on 2 December 1770: ’The procession was performed at the Hotel Dieu, that is usually made there on the first Sunday of every month. The friars and nuns, who nurse the sick, were on this occasion clad in white, with black cloaks, and carried long candles in their hands.’ Whilst on 30 May in 1771, during his time in the French capital described annually recurring festivities, called the feast of the sacraments (Fête-Dieu), all churches arranged parades, music, flower arrangements and candles. An important part was that along many streets people hung ‘tapestry of all sorts’ as high up as the second floor. The walls of the houses being decorated with colourful weavings must have formed a part of the spectacle itself, while the owners had the opportunity to show off their textile wealth to neighbours and other passers-by.
Three of Carl Linnaeus’ later students who travelled during his old age and even after his lifetime, reflected on some further connections between light and textiles – seen in the context of their European perspective. Anders Sparrman (1748-1820), when he worked as an assistant botanist on James Cook’s (1728-1779) second voyage, noted in his journal when the ship lay at anchor off the island of Mallicolo how cloths caused problems. The danger arose because of smoke emerging from below deck; everybody seemed to fear the worst, that is to say, that the gunpowder store would catch fire and explode. Relieved, Sparrman wrote on 1 August 1774: ‘Fortunately, the evil still only extended to a candle that had fallen on top of a cloth jacket and Tahitian bark cloth down in the storeroom where it was easily extinguished’. The burning cloths were quenched without difficulty and order on the ship restored. Exactly one year later in another part of the world, Göran Rothman (1739-1778) described how he and his companions during fieldwork managed to have an evening meal and sleep in reasonable comfort outside Tripoli in Libya on 1 August 1775: ‘We took now an earth den, made us a lamp of the oil which was left from the dinner in a bottle of the oil and vinegar mixture for the salad. And as we were well armed and had good watch both by the cannons in the ship and in the rooms outside, we lay down on the floor to sleep and made a bed of sails, cloth and clothes.’ Whilst Adam Afzelius (1750-1837), as the final of these travelling naturalists outside Europe, on 12 June in 1795 from a field trip in Sierra Leone made notes about candles, clothes and a good night’s sleep:
Sources: