ikfoundation.org
Promoting Natural & Cultural History
A complex interaction of long-lived traditions in combination with economic, social and geographical circumstances gave rise to the rich variety of woven and embroidered textiles from farmer’s homes in southernmost Sweden (Skåne) during the period 1750 to 1860. The aim of this historical essay is to demonstrate the changes in the villages and people's daily lives during the early 19th century with the assistance of artworks and maps and give details of which possible effects it had on a decorative weaving technique as double interlocked tapestries.
A substantial increase in the population during the period 1750-1860 was one important reason for the farmers’ growing wealth. It was primarily the increasing life expectancy which formed the basis for the steadily growing population. Other favouring factors were more prolonged periods of peace, fewer severe epidemics, the potatoes as an essential source of nutrition and the rearrangements of the villages by law in reforms of partitioning.
A weaving technique such as “rölakan”, or double interlocked tapestry, was one of many traditions which developed and flourished with the more and more prosperous farmers, especially in the county of southern Skåne. This had several reasons. It can briefly be noted that the freeholders had few possibilities to increase in number when there was no more land to buy – an alternative was that ownership of land could be shared – it was instead the people without prospects of owning a property that grew. This “lower class” of country people, including crofters, dependent tenants and other poor became cheap labour for the wealthy farmers as well as for the county’s many estates. Circumstances, amongst others, contributed to the farmers’ wives improving possibilities to get more time to produce decorative textiles, which displayed the prosperity of the family, when the everyday household tasks, to a more considerable extent, could be managed by paid servants.
It can not be stated with certainty which exact implications the reforms of partitioning had for the development of such textiles. However, decorative weaving and embroidering were both extensive handicrafts already before the reform, but in many areas, it increased further and became refined in the patterns during the 1820s-1840s. This can, of course, have been part of the technique as well as the development of the patterns themselves, but the improving economic advantages as the reform gave rise to also had an influence. Another reality as a result of the reform was the purely social changes, with a more isolated life on the farms outside the villages where one, to a greater extent, had to keep company/work together with the people on the farm. Most probably, this could, among other matters, make more time available for weaving when a farmer family’s number of decorative textiles more and more came to display the home’s status and wealth, at the same time as the daughters’ dowries could expand in richness and proportion.
Sources: