ikfoundation.org
Promoting Natural & Cultural History
Knitted stockings were important export items in many coastal areas of England and Wales already during the seventeenth century – Whitby was no exception. Stockings from Yorkshire were usually knitted in wool qualities, to be used as a warm, water-resistant and durable article of clothing. This essay will take a closer look at such evidence via port books, census reports, adverts in local newspapers, photographs, directories and clothes lists for Arctic travels during an almost 250 year long period. However, at the time of my research at the Whitby Museum, only two pairs of stockings had been preserved in this collection, both of cotton. Overall it seems rare for more than hundred year old woollen stockings to end up in museum collections, due to that stockings and socks most of the time were darned or patched until the toe and heal had been totally worn-out. On coarser worsted models, the ankle piece could even be reused by unravel the yarn and knit a new foot for the stocking.
Much earlier evidence has been possible to trace via the Whitby Port Books, documents which recorded textile-related goods, above all the knitted stockings that often arrived in the harbour for export – principally to be sent to France, Flanders and Holland. Here is an example from 7 February 1674:
‘twenty dozen children’s woollen stockings
two dozen mens woollen stockings’
Another early primary source connected to stockings in Whitby is to be found in a probate inventory dated 1703. According to this, the widow Sarah Harrison left such a large quantity of mixed textiles that she – or possibly her late husband since many of the listed items are described as ‘old’ – must have run some kind of small haberdashery business. Especially with reference to ‘37 skeins of yarn, 4 pairs of stockings, 15 handkerchiefs, 20 old hoods, 30 old pinners, 4 old neckcloths, 1 small parcel of hood lining’.
Whilst references to stockings mostly originate from the 19th century, the first in the form of a rare printed advertisement dated 1813 for ‘Mrs Craigs’ Shop in Bridge-Street’. She sold all kinds of fine cloths and accessories at ‘Prime Cost’; in other words, the proprietor offered her stock for the best possible prices that would bring neither profit nor loss to herself. ‘A Large and Choice Assortment of Printed Cottons, Sarcenets, Ginghams, Shawls, and Muslins of all descriptions; Calicoes, Silk Handkerchiefs, Flannels, Worsted and Cotton Stockings, &c. &c. Whitby, Feb. 11, 1813’. The textile goods mentioned in the printed advertisement include ‘Worsted and Cotton Stockings’, implying that Mrs Craig chose not to use the word ‘hosiery’ in marketing her wares. The term ‘hosiery’ for knitted products is found as early as the 1760s in documents referring to cargoes for outward bound ships, but the word ‘hosier’ is not found in Whitby until 1818, when it occurs on the print reproduced earlier showing ‘Hebron Linen Draper Haberdasher Hosiers’ in Old Market Place.
Around the time of Scoresby’s Arctic voyages and in the coming decades, local Whitby businesses can also be linked to stockings among other textile goods. In particular registered in Baines’s (1823), Pigot’s (1834) and White’s (1840) directories, who all listed hosiers active in those years in Whitby.
Hosiers – 1823
Hosiers – 1834
Hosiers – 1840
The 1823 directory further indicates that many of the ‘linen and woollen drapers’ were also ‘hosiers’, meaning that they sold knitted garments like stockings, caps and sweaters. Hebron’s business – visualised on a Whitby print from 1818 – reappears in 1823, while Charles Limb is listed as a hosier in all three directories. Both the hosiers Leng and Limb can also be found in the 1837 Poor Law Valuation of Whitby, which reveals that both tradesmen were ‘owner’ as well as ‘occupier’ of their respective addresses with ‘Shop and dwelling-house’. It can be presumed that William Leng was the younger of the two, since he is mentioned as late as 1864 in Slater’s directory, and also in the censuses of 1841 and 1851 (aged 50 and 59), while no trace remains of the hosier Charles Limb after 1840.
Few people claimed knitting as their occupation in the census reports of 1841-1911, whether by hand or machine. In 1841 the word ‘knitting’ is not even mentioned, though one man of twenty does appear as a ‘stocking weaver’, which would have involved mechanically “woven” stockings with a knitted structure. This kind of work can be traced further back in the parish church registers, in which three men are described as ‘stocking weavers’ at the baptisms of their children in the year 1800, though none appears again. The 1851 census includes the 66 year-old widow Ann Scott, who lived in Baxtergate and worked with ‘Manual Labour Knitting’, but after her no other knitter appears for twenty years, until the unmarried 61 year-old Elisabeth Jackson of Haggersgate who gave her occupation in 1871 as ‘Knitting’. Both these women may have knitted stockings or sweaters, either to sell themselves or for some shop in Whitby that sold hand-knitted garments. For instance, Miss E. Clark’s Berlin Room in Flowergate advertised ‘Knitting’ in 1855 in the Whitby Gazette, and she continued to advertise until 1864. Other advertisers of the time who may have needed hand-knitters were T. Bland in 1865 for his or her ‘Best Knitted Guernseys, Worsted Stockings...’; and J. Trowsdale (illustrated above), who between 1870 and 1880 sold ‘Knitting Worsteds, Fingering Wools, Fleecy, Berlin & Lamb Wools, Angoras, Knitting Cotton &c’.
The 1881 census mentions a ‘Stocking Knitter’ called Lizetta Gibson, a 45 year-old widow living off Haggersgate. This hand-knitter does not reappear in 1891, but now 15 year-old Cathrine Bonwick of Church Street is listed as a ‘Knitting Machinist’. This girl was living with her parents George and Cathrine Bonwick, both 48 years old and ‘Hosier Manufacturers’. The father, G. H. Bonwick of Church Street, had already advertised in the Whitby Gazette in 1885 as a ‘Wholesale and Retail Stocking, Guernsey, and General Knitter’. It is impossible to say how long the Bonwick family were active as machine knitters in Whitby, but they are not mentioned in the censuses of either 1881 or 1901, and only advertised in the local paper in the mid-1880s. A woman of the time who accepted orders for knitting was a Mrs Bell who in 1890 offered ‘Stockings, Socks, Vests, Petticoats, &c.m, knit to order’. In other words, there was a demand for individually made garments to be knitted precisely according to the customer’s instructions. The 1901 census mentions two women as combining knitting with other work. These were both widows: 74 year-old Jane Kitching of The Cragg whose work was ‘Plain Sewing Shirt & Knitter’, and 32 year-old Ellen Hill of Church Street, a ‘Washerwoman & Knitter’ who also chose to add that she was employed. Whether her employment was as a washerwoman or as a knitter or both is unclear. But what these women knitters had in common was that they were all either widows or unmarried. In other words, needed to earn their living at one of the occupations possible for single women at the time. In the 1911 census no woman claimed knitting as her paid work, but there can be no doubt that hand-knitting clothes for family needs must continued to be part of everyday life in Whitby after this time.
In conclusion from a wider English perspective. The hand-knitting industry in England reached its peak during the 16th and 17th centuries, providing an occupation and generating an income for a considerable number of knitters. The main centres were London, Nottingham, Leicester, Norfolk and Yorkshire, but as early as 1589 William Lee in London invented a mechanical process enabling knitting to be done faster and with more consistent results. This was the so-called stocking frame which within a hundred years made possible in many places the creation of an important cottage industry for the hosiery trade. Even so, hand-knitting survived side by side with machine production for several reasons. Hand-knitting required little equipment and could be done while sitting or walking, or after dark by firelight, enabling short free moments to be used for making clothing for the family or for sale. Also, a problem with knitting clothes on stocking frames was the fact that the process had been largely standardised for many years, allowing little room for changes of fashion, design or material, while a woman knitting by hand was freer to adopt new ideas. Hand-knitted products also had the advantage of being cheaper for the customer, since the women, children and old people who made them were paid astonishingly little. Meanwhile frame-work knitters were more expensive, since having invested money in their mechanised equipment they were considered to be skilled workers. In any case, coarse socks knitted by hand were often thought to be more hard-wearing, or to put it another way, one got better quality without paying more. So hand-knitting survived as a business option, even if suffering increasing competition already in the early 19th century while it also remained a convenient way of knitting clothes for one’s own family requirements – by many a popular handicraft even up to present-day.
Sources: